2006-11-06 21:21:50 Marie-Therese O’Loughlin

Re: From the CrookedLawyers.com Guestbook {2}

THE RELIGIOUS ARE FRAUDSTERS The Order of The Sisters of Mercy is nothing more than an order of fraudsters and I can prove it. TITLE VI: PHYSICAL AND JURIDICAL PERSONS. CHAPTER I: THE CANONICAL STATUS OF PHYSICAL PERSONS
Can. 96: By baptism one is incorporated into the Church of Christ and constituted a person in it, with the duties and the rights which, in accordance with each one’s status, are proper to Christians, in so far as they are in ecclesiastical communion and unless a lawfully issued sanction intervenes. Can. 97 ß1 a person, who has completed the eighteenth year of age, has attained majority; below this age, a person is a minor. ß2 a minor who has not completed the seventh year of age is an infant. In addition, is considered incapable of personal responsibility; on completion of the seventh year, however, the minor is presumed to have the use of reason. I can justify making the accusation I have because, given that at just under age 5yrs I was, on a voluntary basis, accepted by the Sisters of Mercy, Goldenbridge, industrial School, St.Vincent’s, Inchicore, Dublin 8 Ireland. From documents, I have discovered that I was there for some time before I was in front of a Dublin District Court Judge. Under the Children Act 1908, CHARGED WITH ‘DESTITUTION’ I WAS THEN – BY JUDGE, McCarthy ORDERED TO BE SENTENCED; – INTO GOLDENBRIDGE INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL UNTIL I WAS SIXTEEN YEARS OLD. If the Sisters of Mercy are not liars and fraudulent, they may wish to explain the following: 1. As stated above in Can 97, B2, A minor who has not completed the seventh year of age {who is called an infant}; and is considered incapable of personal responsibility…………….. Nonetheless, on completion of the seventh year, however, the minor is automatically then presumed to have reached the age of reason. 2. Why did they allow the Courts to charge me fully knowing that “I am incapable of personal responsibility”? – They needed the conviction to secure the child allowance How many of you out there were unjustly accused, because you were under age 7? – A lot I should imagine. How many Religious Orders had a hand in your detentions? Keep in mind, if these people say they did nothing wrong, why did they not fight the judicial system for the younger children on the grounds of being incapable due to age? I think I have made my case. Some parents were coerced into allowing their progeny to be handed over to the care of the religious orders purely for pecuniary gain.

Touting for business was very widespread in order to sustain the upkeep of the religious orders & their properties. They pleaded with the courts to keep sending children! A deliberation was not unfortunately – given to the emotionality/consciousness & well-being of the children. Capitation grants were all that MATTERED.

I GREW UP IN AN UNRECEPTIVE MILIEU WITH NOT A SOLITARY QUALIFIED PERSON IN SIGHT. AT ANY GIVEN TIME THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY 185 CHILDREN CONFINED. TWO NUNS, WHO WERE SKILLED IN ‘TEACHING ONLY’ HAD OVERALL RESPONSIBILITY. NOTWITHSTANDING, ALSO, THAT THEY HAD COMMITMENTS TO THEIR CONVENT WHICH WAS DIVORCED FROM THE INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL. THEREFORE, A HUGE QUANTITY OF TIME WAS SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE TWO.
IRISH SOCIETY WOULD NOT EVEN BEGIN TO HAVE A HANDLE ON THE LONELINESS, LACK OF LOVE/PARENTS/VISITORS, OR ADVERSITY OR SLAVE MANUAL LABOUR THAT INTERNEES HAD TO DO ON A DAILY BASIS. CHILDREN WERE ALWAYS DISTRESSED. NO AFFECTION WAS AFFORDED THEM, THEY EFFECTIVELY REASSURED THEMSELVES BY KNOCKING THEIR HEADS AGAINST THE CONDENSATED WALLS OF A BIG RECREATION HALL {IRONICALLY – COLLOQUIALLY KNOWN AS ‘THE WRECK’} OR ON ANY OTHER SUITABLE AVAILABLE WALLS. CHILDREN ALSO SOOTHED THEMSELVES BY PLACING THEIR FINGERS, THUMBS ALL AT THE SAME TIME IN THEIR MOUTHS. THE CONTORTIONISTIC -TYPE FACES ON THEM WAS HEART-RENDING, THE FRIGHTENING IMAGES STILL REMAIN WITH ME TO THIS VERY DAY.
OTHERS BIT THEIR NAILS BOTH ON THEIR HANDS & FEET, VERY ANIMALISTIC, BUT IT BROUGHT RELIEF.
A SECOND THOUGHT WAS NEVER GIVEN TO THE CHILDREN ONCE THEY ARRIVED AT THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTITUTIONS TO SERVE OUT THEIR TIME FOR CRIMES THEY NEVER COMMITTED IN THE FIRST INSTANCE. MOTHER IRELAND OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN ASHAMED OF ITSELF AT THE WAY IT TREATED ITS CHILDREN IN THE PAST & IT ISN’T BEFORE TIME THAT IT GOT ITS ACT TOGETHER. IT HAD TO BE COERCED INTO DOING WHAT IS RIGHT. SADLY TO SAY, IT WAS NOT OF THE STATES OWN VOLITION.
CHILDREN WERE always MERE CHATTELS/POSSESSIONS & COULD BE TREATED IN WHATEVER MANNER ADULTS THOUGHT FITTING WITHOUT EVER ASKING THEIR PERMISSION ON MATTERS PERTAINING TO THEM. THE PROCLAMATION WHICH STATES CLEARLY:”cherish all the children equally” WAS/IS IGNORED. Children Rule Okay!. Sisters of Mercy wake up to the call of Mother Catherine MaCauley, THE TEA IS ON THE HOB!

Last edited by Marie-Therese O’ loughlin (2006-11-06 22:01:27)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s